Showing posts with label Miscellaneous. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Miscellaneous. Show all posts

Monday, November 17, 2014

Keystone XL Pipeline Means Cheap Oil for China

A pair if wire-rimmed, round lens, "Ben Franklin" glasses.
Today's Reading

Today's Reading, 2014_11_17 - Keystone XL Pipeline Means Cheap Oil for China


China and Canada have begun trading between each other with Chinese yuan. That includes China being able to buy Canadian oil with Chinese yuan instead of American dollars (the "petrodollar"). This makes buying oil much cheaper for China.

China has also been investing in Canadian tar sand, oil extraction and transport. If the Keystone XL pipeline deal doesn't come through, China wants alternatives to get Canadian oil.

China really wants Canadian oil.

If the Keystone XL pipeline is constructed, crude oil from Canadian tar sands will be piped down to the Gulf of Mexico. Once the crude oil reaches the Gulf, China can then take delivery of the oil in a Free Trade Zone without having to pay any taxes or tariffs on it.

The politicians tell us that the pipeline will create hundreds of thousands of jobs for Americans yet, from what I've read, the more realistic number is a couple thousand jobs.

And most of those jobs will be eliminated after the pipeline is built, as in fewer than 100 permanent jobs will be left.

For the US to truly recover, somewhere around 300,000 new jobs - good paying, full-time, permanent jobs, not recycled, part-time, minimum-wage, temporary jobs - have to be created each and every month.

Cheap oil for China and paltry jobs for Americans, are just two of the downsides to the Keystone XL pipeline.



Reading Material

Wikipedia.org, What is a Free Trade Zone?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_trade_zone

Switchboard.nrdc.org, Anthony Swift: "Keystone XL is a tar sands pipeline to export oil out of the United States"
http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/aswift/keystone_xl_is_a_tar_sands_pip.html

Forbes.com, James Conca: "What is Wrong with the Keystone XL Pipeline?"
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2013/08/25/what-is-wrong-with-the-keystone-xl-pipeline/

NationalGeographic.com, David LaGesse: "Is Canadian Oil Bound for China via Pipeline to Texas?"
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2011/08/110819-keystone-xl-canadian-oil-and-chinese-market/

Washington Post, Juliet Eilperin: "The Keystone XL Pipeline and its Politics, Explained"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/04/03/the-keystone-xl-pipeline-and-its-politics-explained/

NewsMax.com, Courtney Coren: "China Would Get Alberta Oil if Keystone Pipeline Blocked"
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Keystone-Canada-China-oil/2014/03/24/id/561277/



Comments
Please, keep your comments clean, civil and relevant. Cussing with foul language just for the sake of using foul language only proves the person to be an obnoxious, dull-witted fool.

Saturday, July 6, 2013

Just Write is Just Right

A picture of a writing quill in an ink well.
Ye Olde Quill and Ink
It's always a good idea to listen to experienced, professional advice but sometimes you are better off doing things your own way.

Before starting this blog I read several other blogs and web articles on the subject of creating good blogs.

"Stick to one subject for the blog.", they advised.

Ok, I seem to have a particular interest in reading and talking about politics and the economy. Done.

"Backup what you say with links to supporting articles." - more advice from the experts.

Ok, so I bookmarked every article I read. The list of bookmarks grew monstrous. I had a hard time remembering which bookmarked article related to whichever paragraph of what I was writing about. I tried organizing the bookmarks by date and topic, even tried to organize them in a database, but there was just too much overlap of information.

The result of following the expert advise was only a few blog entries were written, each one taking a lot of time and research to write, and the whole process becoming such a chore that I eventually stopped blogging.

At the time of this writing, my previous blog post is just 3 weeks shy of being a whole year ago.

During the past 12 months there were other things I wanted to blog about but they didn't fit into the "politics and economy" niche. Also the memories of the tedious hours, sometimes days, it took to write and refine a single blog post discouraged me.

My blog, like so many others that I've come across in my Internet travels, had been abandoned without any sort of closure. I remember in the beginning telling myself that I wouldn't let that happen, but that is exactly what happened anyway.

A couple days ago a fleeting thought became rooted in my mind... "To hell with'em, just write."

Then I began to ask myself, "Why not?"

Nobody is reading my blog anyway.

Well... other than the NSA computers downloading every character I've typed and complex algorithms processing the data to determine if I'm either the ultimate, mastermind, terrorist of the universe or just another nobody-crackpot, but even then no living person is reading my drivel.

So who cares whether or not I stay on track with a specific niche?

Who cares if I don't fact check and backup my opinions with links and data? They are my opinions and these opinions of this piss-pot-poor, cranky-old-fart aren't going to alter the course of anything.

I like chocolate ice-cream and, in my opinion, vanilla ice-cream tastes yucky!

Wait for it... wait for it...

Hmm...

The world seems to be continuing about it's business despite my opinion of vanilla ice-cream and despite my not having any hard facts or scientific data to back my opinion. (And I still like chocolate ice-cream and I'm still of the opinion that vanilla ice-cream tastes yucky.)

All the expert advice, suggestions, guidelines, techniques, etc. that I've read about blogging may come in handy someday but for now just writing something,... anything,.... is better than the 12 months of "nothing" I've written so far.

For now, "just write" is just right.



Comments
Please, keep your comments clean, civil and relevant. Cussing with foul language just for the sake of using foul language only proves the person to be an obnoxious, dull-witted fool.

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Jelly Bean Inflation

The other day I had a craving for jelly beans. So on my way home I pulled in to one of the two grocery stores in town to buy a pound of jelly beans.

I remember, when I was a kid, there was a five-and-dime in the town near where I grew up. Inside the store was a long, u-shaped glass counter and behind the glass were bins and trays full of different sweets and sugary delights. For a dime, a white paper bag containing a pound (usually topped off with an extra large scoop) of jelly beans could be had.

This and other old memories began to surface as the now adult me walked towards the bulk-candy section of the grocery store.

As I stood under the large hanging sign that proclaimed “SAVE BY THE POUND!” my memories of yesteryear were smacked-down by the reality of today.

$3.99 for a pound of generic jelly beans.

What the . . . ?

Ah, come on!

These are just generic, no-name, balls-of-sugar-and-food-coloring, jelly beans.

Four bucks?!

(And this didn’t include sales tax yet!)

I looked over the next couple bins to where the gourmet “Jelly Belly” brand was stored.

Oh, they only want $8.99 for a pound of those things.

Phttt!

I walked out of that store and drove to the other grocery store in town.

The second grocery store doesn’t have a bulk-candy section. The candy is sold, prepackaged, in one of the aisles.

$1.79 for a 15oz (not quite a full, 16oz pound) plastic bag of the store brand (generic) jelly beans.

$1.79?

Just shy of a pound?

I bought a bag to satisfy my sweet tooth and hoped the sugar rush would ease my depression caused by seeing massive inflation in real-time.



Comments
Please, keep your comments clean, civil and relevant. Cussing with foul language just for the sake of using foul language only proves the person to be an obnoxious, dull-witted fool.

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Greek Default, Eurozone CDSs, American Banks on the Hook

A Greek default will cause big problems for Europe, America, and the rest of the world.

Greece has been on the verge of default for a couple years now. But each time Greece has been just about ready to go under, the Eurozone leaders and central banks cobble together some last minute scam, I mean, plan to keep Greece afloat and kick the can a little farther down the road. Then about a month later the whole thing unravels and the big wigs come up with another con, er, conjure up another plan to save Greece.

Detect any sarcasm there?

(And to clarify... the "Eurozone" is not the same as the continent of Europe. The Eurzone refers to the countries in Europe that use the Eruo as their currency. Not all of the countries in Europe use the Euro so those countries are not part of the Eurozone.)

If Greece is in such dire straights, then why is it that most the talking and deal making is done by the leaders of France (Nicolas Sarkozy) and Germany (Angela Merkel) and not so much from the leader of Greece?

It's because the French and German banks hold most of Greece's debt.

If Greece goes down, the large French and German banks will go down soon after. Those banks will drag down many other banks in Europe and the US.

Yup. The big banks in the US have got their hands caught in this cookie jar too.

The big American banks insured the big French and German banks with credit default swaps (CDSs).

Remember the big stink about AIG?

Back in 2008/2009 when all the big American banks were in trouble, AIG was the patsy stuck holding the bag and went down in flames because of CDSs. Now the shoe is on the other foot and the big American banks are stuck holding the CDS bag when the European banks get pulled under by Greece defaulting on its debts.

There are many theories as to what will happen when that time comes... and it will come.

One school of thought is that the Eurozone leaders won't allow Greece to officially default, thus triggering the credit default swaps that would most likely destroy what's left of the European and American economies.

(Turd Furguson Metals Report - Why Greece Matters and What It Means To You
http://www.tfmetalsreport.com/blog/3415/why-greece-matters-and-what-it-means-you)

Technically, mathematically, by all rights and definition, Greece will default but the Eurozone leaders and central bankers will demand, command, and strong-arm if they have to, every party involved not to declare Greece's default a default.

It's banana pudding.

It's flying pigs and polka-dotted elephants.

Call it whatever you want, but it is not, under any circumstances, a default.

(In the best Marlon Brando, Godfather impression you can muster.) - Capiche?

Another school of thought is that there are too many players and too many variables involved in this Greek tragedy to control so the whole thing is going to get real messy no matter what anybody does.

(The Economic Collapse Blog - 8 Reasons Why The Greek Debt Deal May Not Stop A Chaotic Greek Debt Default
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/8-reasons-why-the-greek-debt-deal-may-not-stop-a-chaotic-greek-debt-default)

The banks, on either side of the pond, aren't coming clean as to how much they are truly exposed to Greek debt.

There are speculators betting big on Greece defaulting. We've seen what speculators can do to the price of oil, now similar sharks are sensing Greek blood in the Mediterranean waters.

Greece is going to have elections in April and the next batch of Greek politicians may give the Eurozone leaders and central bankers the finger.

And wouldn't it be convenient if there were some big global event to take people's attention away from the economic messes in Europe and the US?

Something, like... oh, maybe another world war kicked off by Israel and Iran?

Greece isn't the only headache for world leaders that could be conveniently snuffed-out by global war.

Then there is always the chance, however slim, that somehow this whole thing sorts itself out and there will be no big calamity.

Yeah, I'm not buying that one either.

The longer those involved keep denying and lying about the eventual default of Greece the worse it will be for the rest of us.



Comments
Please, keep your comments clean, civil and relevant. Cussing with foul language just for the sake of using foul language only proves the person to be an obnoxious, dull-witted fool.



Related Links:
Turd Furguson Metals Report - Why Greece Matters and What It Means To You
http://www.tfmetalsreport.com/blog/3415/why-greece-matters-and-what-it-means-you

The Economic Collapse Blog - 8 Reasons Why The Greek Debt Deal May Not Stop A Chaotic Greek Debt Default
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/8-reasons-why-the-greek-debt-deal-may-not-stop-a-chaotic-greek-debt-default

National Credit Rating Downgrade Costs Us All

The downgrade of the US's credit rating, by relation of the currency, downgrades the credit worthiness of every corporation, business, organization and person in the country.

(Reuters - United States loses prized AAA credit rating from S&P
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/06/us-usa-debt-downgrade-idUSTRE7746VF20110806)

In a mostly debt based economy like the US's, credit worthiness is a big deal. That's why so many people with credit cards and people who are trying to get a home loan (or any kind of loan for that matter), obsess about their FICO score (their personal credit rating). A downgrade of credit worthiness makes it much harder to get loans and harder to pay off existing loans.

Here's how the some of the cascading affects of a national credit downgrade costs us all.

There are other AA+ rated countries in the world who have a much, much lower debt-to-income ratio than the US. That low debt-to-income makes those other AA+ (and the AAA) countries more attractive to global investors.

If you were a global investor, who would you feel more secure about lending money to - a nation that is bankrupt and governed by dysfunctional politicians or a nation that has very little debt and is governed sensibility?

(Hint - The US lost its AAA rating because of too much debt and incompetent politicians.)

Since America's economy is based mostly on debt, the country depends on cheap loans from foreign investors (lenders).

Other countries that have a stable currency, low debt, and positive economic growth are far more attractive to investors than the US. To win back those investors the US has to sweeten the pot by paying the investors (lenders) higher interest rates to get the loans and credit the US needs to function.

Higher interest rates for the federal government will result in higher taxes for the rest of us in order to pay for the rate increases.

Here's the double-whammy. A lot of interest rates on consumer credit and debt are based on the federal interest rates. The higher the federal interest rate goes the higher the consumer interest rates will go.

Higher taxes and interests rates for the general public could be enough to push the nearly flat-lining US economy into a full-fledged economic depression worse than the Great Depression of the 1930's.

The only way now for the US government to afford higher interest rates is to print more money in addition to the trillions of excess that have already been printed. This has a very high risk of triggering hyperinflation.

We're not just getting hit by the federal government debt; we're also getting smacked hard from all levels of government debt all the way down to local, small-town-USA debt.

Now with the best infomercial announcer voice you can image, "But wait... there's more!"

It's not just interest rates on government debt that's going up, it's also the interest rates on any bonds that businesses issue. You know, the places were people work?

Might explain why you haven't gotten a meaningful raise, if any at all, in such a long time.

Any time a government or a business sells bonds they are taking out loans, going into debt.

A bond is a type of loan, to paid with interest. Governments and businesses issue bonds to raise more money to pay for things.

For example; a city council votes to approve a bond issue to build an addition to the school so the school can handle the growing number of students. Investors give the city money in exchange for IOUs (bonds) to be paid back with interest by the city over a specified period of time.

The interest rate of many bonds is based on the interest rate for US federal bonds. If the interest rate for federal government bonds go up so will the interest rates on many other bonds throughout the country.

Higher interest rates make it more expensive for bond issuers (like the city in the above school bond issue example) to get the money they need for growth (more classrooms), maintenance (bridge repair), disaster recovery (flooding) or anything else they need loans for.

When bond issuers can't afford to pay the higher interest rates bond buyers (investors/lenders) are demanding (interest rate hikes) then the bond issuers can't get any more credit. This is a form of credit freeze. A credit freeze in a debt based economy means a lot of things come to a grinding halt - for everyone.

By losing it's AAA credit rating, the US government now has to pay higher interest rates on its debts. Taxpayers have to pay higher taxes to pay for those higher interest rates on government debt as well as paying higher interest rates on their own debts because those interest rates are based on the federal interest rates.

This compounding of interest on all debts, both public and personal, are costing us all dearly.



Comments
Please, keep your comments clean, civil and relevant. Cussing with foul language just for the sake of using foul language only proves the person to be an obnoxious, dull-witted fool.



Related Links:
Reuters - United States loses prized AAA credit rating from S&P
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/06/us-usa-debt-downgrade-idUSTRE7746VF20110806

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Mortgage Settlement Rewards Lawless Banks

The mortgage settlement sets a dangerous precedent placing the banks above the law.

Oklahoma's attorney general is the only one, out of the other forty-nine, that didn't go along with this farce.

Geesh! Talk about short-term gains with long-term negative consequences.

What am I grumbling about?

The $25 billion is mere chump change for the banks and we're the chumps.

What this settlement does is set a legal precedent that basically protects the banks from any prosecution. They are now above the law. Any crimes the banks commit will now be absolved by paltry fines.

The big banks committed nation-wide fraud, perjury and out-right theft to the tune of trillions of dollars, destroyed the global economy and in return they get bailed-out, lavished with multi-million dollar bonuses and slap-on-the-wrist-with-a-feather fines.

If you don't know anything about foreclosure-gate and robo-signing then look them up on the Internet. It is truly sickening and maddening stuff.

Here are three, good articles on this spectacular failure of justice, mortgage settlement.

From Greg Hunter's USA Watchdog.com:
"Mortgage Settlement Will Plunge Real Estate Values"
http://usawatchdog.com/mortgage-settlement-will-plunge-real-estate-values/

From US News:
"Mortgage Settlement a Distraction, Not a Solution"
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/economic-intelligence/2012/02/10/mortgage-settlement-a-distraction-not-a-solution

From Gonzalo Lira's blog:
"A Tale of Two Settlements"
http://gonzalolira.blogspot.com/2012/02/tale-of-two-settlements.html



Comments
Please, keep your comments clean, civil and relevant. Cussing with foul language just for the sake of using foul language only proves the person to be an obnoxious, dull-witted fool.

Friday, December 2, 2011

Bank Bailouts, Impossible Debt and Global Meltdown

The global economy has been in a slow motion crash since 2008. The major banks of the world have conjured up such a massive debt burden that now the global financial systems are imploding, accelerating the speed of the global economic crash.

Every time the Federal Reserve, the central bank for the US, loans out money it is essentially creating more US dollars out of thin air. Every US dollar in existence represents a unit of debt that must be repaid. That's how our debt-based monetary system works.

Before 1933, every US dollar in existence represented a certain amount of physical gold or silver. Since 1933, when President Franklin Delano Roosevelt confiscated US citizens gold to revalue the US dollar, and then later in 1971, when President Richard Nixon took the dollar completely off the gold standard, the US dollar has been backed by nothing but the promise that the US Government (i.e. the US taxpayer) would work to produce goods or services in exchange for that dollar.

Every US taxpayer has to work to pay off the debt that every US dollar in existence represents. Every time the Federal Reserve loans (prints) money it is creating more debt that the US taxpayers have to work to pay off.

The Federal Reserve is not a US Government institution. It is a privately owned bank. The US taxpayers, who are also voters, have absolutely no control over the Federal Reserve or say in its actions but the Federal Reserve controls the fruits of every US taxpayers' labors (and anyone elses' in the world who uses US dollars). The more US dollars (debt) the Federal Reserve prints, the longer you have to work to pay off those newly, mass-created debt dollars.

For banks, other people's debt owed to the banks is an asset. Debt is the banks' wealth. Wealth equals power. The greater the wealth, the greater the power. Since debt is wealth for the banks, the more debt that exists the more power the banks have. The greater the debt, the greater the banks' power.

Power corrupts.

With the advent of computers, complex financial derivatives, high frequency trading and other hi-tech chicanery the banks were able to "book" profits (other people's debt) faster and faster to the point where the most powerful banks could generate millions of debt dollars in a mere second. Blinded by near instant profits the banks forgot that it takes time for people to pay off their debts.

Banks have fallen into their own greedy trap and leveraged (took on debt themselves) their wealth in pursuit of ever increasing profits and power. When the banks' own debts came due (in massive amounts of high speed margin calls, credit default swaps and many other shady deals gone bad) the banks were unable to pay those debts because the banks' wealth, other people's debt, takes time to pay back. Even though the banks "booked" instant profits in the billions and trillions, their real wealth, the assets they actually had on hand and in reserve were all tied up in other people's debt - debt that takes time to pay off.

In real time, in the real world minutes-and-hours time, the banks are, technically and genuinely, insolvent. The major banks of the industrialized world are all broke because their profits, though claimed instantly on their books, are based on debt that will take an incalculable amount of years to pay off.

Because of the banks' insanely excessive and greedy leveraging and gambling, the derivatives liabilities (the banks' gambling debts) are estimated in the quadrillions of debt dollars. There will never be enough people and lifetimes of labor on this earth to pay off that much debt.

The major banks of the world are broke and each and every of them know it.

Back in 2008, at the precipice of the global economic collapse, the banks refused to lend to one another. This was dubbed a "liquidity crisis". The big banks weren't lending to each other because they all "knew" (it takes a shyster to know a shyster) that they were all broke.

This wasn't a liquidity crisis, it was an insolvency crisis. If it had been called what it really was, a global insolvency crisis, the major banks of the world would have to publicly admit they were broke. To admit they were broke would mean admitting the banks had no wealth. No wealth means no power and to the power mad oligarchy of the banks that was absolutely unthinkable.

To save the world's banking systems' face (and power) the central banks of the world opened up lines of ridiculously cheap credit to the major banks. In effect, the central banks of the world, especially the Federal Reserve, were creating trillions of debt dollars out of thin air to preserve the power of the major banks. The massive amounts of debt dollars created by the Federal Reserve will steal the blood and sweat of tax payers for generations to come.

Oh, yes, it's stealing. Theft. Grand larceny on a global scale.

The more debt dollars that are created out of thin air, the less valuable the existing debt dollars become. The less valuable the debt dollars are the more of them it takes to buy stuff. The more debt dollars it takes to buy stuff the longer you have to work to accumulate those debt dollars.

Get it?

Going slightly off track here to better illustrate this last point I made...

Currently the national debt of the US is $15 trillion. There are about 7 billion people in the world as of late 2011. Divide the national debt of the US, $15 trillion, by the number of people living on this earth, 7 billion, and the result is $2,142 dollars of debt for every man, woman and child on this planet.

That's just the national debt of the US.

The combined derivative exposure of Bank of American and JP Morgan-Chase is estimated to be over $150 trillion. Those two American mega banks have a debt load ten times greater than the entire, super-power-nation-of-the-world, United States of America!

Just two freaking banks!!

A trillion is a thousand, billions. A quadrillion is a million, billions. The major banks of world have conjured up over a quadrillion of derivative debt dollars and burdened us with all of it.

Returning now to liquidity/insolvency crisis of 2008...

In the fall of 2008 the US Federal Government passed the T.A.R.P. (Troubled Asset Relief Program) to bail out the major US banks and corporations to the tune of $700 billion (then later nudged up to $800 billion).

The US taxpayers/voters were against this and the bill didn't pass the first time. Then the banks pressured their puppet politicians and, against the will of the people, the TARP, bankster bail-out, bill was passed.

US taxpayers were justifiably outraged. However, it turns out that the US taxpayers (and the politicians) were being kept in the dark about much, much bigger bail-outs.

With last summer's passage of the Dodd-Frank Bank Reform and Consumer Protection bill, a small piece of legislation was attached to the end of the bill that granted a one-time-only audit of the Federal Reserve for the specific period of December 1, 2007 through July 21, 2010. (Wikipediea - "Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodd–Frank_Wall_Street_Reform_and_Consumer_Protection_Act)

After several months of going through thousands of scattered documents begrudgingly released by the Federal Reserve, very disturbing revelations are coming to light.

For years the Federal Reserve has been vehemently fighting inquiries by the US Congress and private institutions for an accounting of its actions. The small glimpse gained by the Dodd-Frank bill shows why the Federal Reserve is so amendment about it's secrets.

Unbeknownst to the US taxpayers and even the US politicians, the Federal Reserve, between December 2007 and July 2010, had doled out over $16 trillion, US taxpayer obligated dollars to the major banks of the US and the world.

On December 5, 2008, over $1.2 trillion dollars where handed out to the major banks by the Federal Reserve. $400 billion more than the US Federal Government had given the banks just a couple months earlier. (Bloomberg - "Wall Street Aristocracy Got $1.2 Trillion in Secret Loans" http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-21/wall-street-aristocracy-got-1-2-trillion-in-fed-s-secret-loans.html)

By March 2009, the supposed lowest point of the Great Recession (baloney, we are in a Greater Depression, folks), the Federal Reserve had given the banks almost $8 trillion. The $700 billion TARP that everyone was screaming over was merely chump change compared to what the Federal Reserve was secretly doling out. (Bloomberg - "Secret Fed Loans Gave Banks $13 Billion Undisclosed to Congress" http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-28/secret-fed-loans-undisclosed-to-congress-gave-banks-13-billion-in-income.html)

The TARP funds doled out by the US Government at least had some strings attached (some, not much but some). The egregious amounts the Federal Reserved lavished on its friends had basically no strings attached to them.

Here's a few names you might recognize and how much they received from the Federal Reserve over a two year period.

Citigroup - $2.513 trillion

Morgan Stanley - $2.041 trillion

Merrill Lynch - $1.949 trillion

Bank of America - $1.344 trillion

Barclays PLC - $868 billion

Bear Sterns - $853 billion

Goldman Sachs - $814 billion

Royal Bank of Scotland - $541 billion

JP Morgan Chase - $391 billion

Deutsche Bank - $354 billion

UBS - $287 billion

Credit Suisse - $262 billion

Lehman Brothers - $183 billion

Bank of Scotland - $181 billion

BNP Paribas - $175 billion

Wells Fargo - $159 billion

Dexia - $159 billion

Wachovia - $142 billion

Dresdner Bank - $135 billion

Societe Generale - $124 billion

"All Other Borrowers" - $2.639 trillion

All that in just two years. It's unknown how much they've received in the past and are currently receiving! (GAO Federal Investigation Audit Report, document page 131/webpage 144, http://www.scribd.com/doc/60553686/GAO-Fed-Investigation#outer_page_144 - It's a 266 page report. If you have slow Internet you may want to get up and make a pot of coffee while you wait for the page to load.)

Free money for the banksters that caused a global economic collapse, no strings attached, mega bonuses and profits for the banksters while at the same time totally screwing over the US taxpayer.

Nice.

But, hey, that's all ancient history, way back in 2008 through 2010, right?

Last week bank liquidity seized up in the Eurozone (the parts of Europe that use Euro as their currency).

On Wednesday of this week (November 30, 2011), the Federal Reserve along with the Bank of Canada, the Bank of England, the Bank of Japan, the European Central Bank, and the Swiss National Bank, in coordinated efforts, provided open-ended credit to Eurozone banks.

In more specific terms, the US Federal Reserved gave out unlimited loans to the European Central Bank to bail-out the European banks.

The bulk of the European bank bail-out has been dumped on the US taxpayer, once again, for an unlimited amount of debt dollars for US taxpayer to pay for countless generations to come. (Zero Hedge - "Here Comes The Global, US-Funded Liquidity Bail Out" http://www.zerohedge.com/news/here-comes-global-liquidity-bail-out)

The Federal Reserve bailed-out the major European banks because all the big banks are interconnected - European and American big banks.

If any of the major European banks failed (and it is suspected a major French bank was on the verge of going under Tuesday night) then all other major banks of the world, including the US mega-banks would be dragged under in a chain reaction if financial implosion.

Remember, wealth is power. The banks must maintain the illusion of wealth (debt created out of thin air) to retain their global power. This isn't about home mortgages. This is about global power.

Ok, another step-aside to illustrate my "banksters global power" point.

The mega bank Goldman Sachs has been called a "Vampire Squid" for good reason. (Rolling Stone - "The Great American Bubble Machine" http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-great-american-bubble-machine-20100405) The mega bank has its tentacles embedded into many levels of financial and political power throughout the world.

For example, Greece's new prime minister, Lucas Papademos, ran the Central Bank of Greece when Goldman Sachs was doing some shady derivatives deals to hide Greece's debt in order to facilitate Greece's entry into the Eurozone. Greece's head of debt management, Petros Christodoufou, is a former Goldman Sachs employee.

The newly elected prime minister and financial minister of Italy, Mario Monti, is an international adviser to Goldman Sachs. Other former international advisers to Goldman Sachs who have held high positions of power and influence are Germany's Otmar Issing and Belgium's Karel Van Miert.

The new head honcho at the European Central Bank, Mario Draghi - former managing director of Goldman Sachs International. Some other Goldman Sachs International alumni: Antonio Borges was the former vice chairman of Goldman Sachs International before becoming the (former) head of the IMF's European Department and Ireland's former Attorney General, Peter Sutherland is now a non-executive director of Goldman Sachs International.

Let's not forget the home team here in the good ol' US of A.

Former Secretaries of Treasury Robert Rubin and Hank Paulson (of TARP infamy) and our current Secretary of Treasury (and former head of the New York Federal Reserve), Timothy Geithner and Mr. Geithner's chief of staff, former Goldman Sachs lobbyist, Mark Patterson.

For more disgusting details on the history and far reaching influence of Goldman Sachs read this Wikipedia page on the vampire squid: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldman_Sachs

Oh, and as an additional side note, did any of you read about how our illustrious former Secretary of Treasury, Hank Paulson, leaked insider information to his Goldman Sachs bankster buddies about the bail-outs of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac seven weeks in advance? (Zero Hedge - "Hank Paulson Tipped Off The Goldman-Led "Plunge Protection Team" About Fannie Bankruptcy 7 Weeks In Advance" http://www.zerohedge.com/news/hank-paulson-tipped-goldman-led-plunge-protection-team-about-fannie-bankruptcy-7-weeks-advance)

Now returning to my frothing at the mouth rant about the Federal Reserve and debt dollars...

The banking crisis of 2008 is happening all over again and will happen again even sooner the next time until eventually no amount of debt dollar printing will stave off the total and complete collapse of the global financial system.

The fundamental problems were never fixed. All that these massive bail-outs have accomplished is to "kick the can down the road", to paper-over, cover-up, hide the un-payable debts the banks have conjured into being. Debts the rest of us are expected to pay off.

But there's nothing any of us can do about this, right?

You couldn't possibly learn about this stuff, talk about it, write about it, tell others about it or educate others about any of this.

Nah, you couldn't do that.

If more and more people knew about the stuff the banksters are doing to them then these people would still not be able to do anything about it.

It's not like people could get so fed up that they grabbed hold of their elected representatives by the short hairs and commanded those representatives to reinstate the Glass-Steagal Act which separated the gambling casino-like investment banks from the safe-haven-for-consumers commercial banks.

Nope. Can't do it.

People also can't possibly command their elected representatives to abolish the Federal Reserve and return the creation of US currency to the US Congress (as it was intended to by the US Constitution). That would mean the people, the voters who have hold of the Congress critters by the short hairs, could have a say in matter; could actually do something about how many debt dollars were created out of thin air.

What?

Voters having a say in their government? A government of the people, by the people, for the people?

That's patently ridiculous.

There's absolutely nothing voters can do about it. That's doctrine.

Why, such silly notions of doing something about it might lead to people voting to instate a different monetary system that wasn't debt based.

Barter?

Quaint, old-fashioned, time honored but quite impractical and difficult to tax into oblivion.

Tangible asset backed currency like the gold standard?

Hogwash. That would severely limit how much the politicians can overspend because gold can't printed out of thin air. And the politicians will overspend because there is nothing you can do about it.

A different kind of monetary system? What utter nonsense!

There can be no other type of viable monetary system because the banks say so!

Just because the banks are broke and have collapsed the entire global economy doesn't mean they aren't experts in money.

Phht!

Alternative monetary systems are not allowed by the banks just as fuel efficiency technology is not allowed by oil and automotive companies. Remember, it's all about retaining profits and power. (Global Economic Intersection - "Solve Debt Problems with Non-Debt Money" http://econintersect.com/b2evolution/blog2.php/2011/08/09/solve-debt-problems-with-non-debt-money)

Another thing that voting people couldn't possibly do is yank our Congress critters short hairs hard enough to use existing anti-trust and anti-monopoly laws to break up the "too big to fail" banks and corporations.

No, you can't do any of this because you couldn't possibly find out who your elected representatives are. Online resources like USA.gov's "Contact Elected Officials" http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml don't exist because there is nothing you can do about it.

And even if you did know who your elected officials were, you wouldn't know how to properly communicate with them (grabbing them by the short hairs is just a metaphor - sorry) because that kind of information doesn't exist here http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/uscongress/a/letterscongress.htm either.

Even if you did contact your elected representatives they would never listen to you. Your just one person.

If you helped to educate ten of your friends and relatives and they did the same for ten of their own or maybe a bunch of voting constituents just got hopping mad and demanded their elected representative do something, their elected representative still wouldn't notice because there is nothing these voters can do about it.

Nothing at all.

Not at the federal level, not at the state level and certainly nothing at the local level. Voting constituents leveraging political pressure from the local and state levels against their representative at the federal level will do absolutely no good because there is nothing voters can do about it.

C'mon, don't be silly. The banks have successfully trained you to drop your pants, bend over, spread your butt-cheeks wide open and obediently and willing take whatever they shove up your backside.

You know darn well that there is nothing you can do about it so just learn to accept it.

Now drop your pants and bend over!

If this literary image offends you, I apologize. I'm trying to drive home a very significant point.

If you are not offended, by any of this, then I am saddened.

The reason things have come to this is because we've allowed it to. We have been told, over and over so many times that we've come to believe it, that there is nothing we can do. To just accept things as they are.

We can do something about what's happening. If not for ourselves then for our friends and loved ones.

You don't have to commit acts of valor and great heroism. You just have to communicate with people about these things.

Don't just talk about football and Lady Gaga but also talk about the things that are robbing your children of any chance of prosperity. Brag about your grandchildren and how many times you've written your house representative. While your boasting and kvetching about your gall bladder surgery also one-up your fellow suffers with how many times you've complained to your senator.

If you are a real nut-job, get involved with a political movement. Occupy Wall Street, the Tea Party, the Beer Party (yup, there's one of those http://officialbeerparty.com/wp/about/) or the I-Love-Chocolate-Sundaes Party (Ok, I made that one up).

The Occupy Wall Street movement is right. Wall Street, big corporations and the financial sector in general have thoroughly screwed America and other countries around the world.

The Tea Party movement is right. Big government is too oppressive and too invasive. The federal government should be very limited. The individual states should have more political power, customized to their unique needs and situations, as it was intended by the US Constitution.

Occupy Wall Street movement is against big corporations.

The Tea Party movement is against big government.

If the grassroots people of both Occupy Wall Street and the Tea Party movements ever realized that big corporations and big government are one and the same here in the US then a righteous reckoning would come against the banksters and their puppet politicians.

Oh, mentioning Occupy Wall Street and the Tea Party just made me think of another supplemental tangent to this rant.

Stepping aside again for a moment...

If you talk to folks inclined to the Occupy Wall Street movement you'll probably hear the word "fascism" tossed about. For those of the Tea Party bent, "socialism" is the epithet of choice or "communism" if they are a really old farts.

Me, I'm kind of leaning more towards "corporatism" and "kleptocracy" at this point of my study of this mess we are going through. At least from the "step back and look at the bigger picture" point of view. Delve into the finer details and you can find all kinds of "-isms".

If you would like to read some opinions on corporatism and kleptocracy here are two web articles for your pleasure:

Huffington Post - "American Kleptocracy: How Fears of Socialism and Fascism Hide Naked Theft" http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-j-astore/american-kleptocracy-how_b_547708.html

and...

The American Dream - "Corporatism Is Not Capitalism: 7 Things About The Monolithic Predator Corporations That Dominate Our Economy That Every American Should Know" http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/corporatism-is-not-capitalism-7-things-about-the-monolithic-predator-corporations-that-dominate-our-economy-that-every-american-should-know

Alright, back to what we can do about this festering mess...

Many are looking towards the 2012 US Presidential election for the cure-all for what ails America.

Folks, no one person, not even the President of the United States is going to be able to set things back on the right track.

Here's a little heads up. Mitt Romney will be the Republican candidate for President. Not because of any of his policies or stances on any thing but because Wall Street has given him more money than any of the other Republican candidates combined. (The American Dream - "The Big Wall Street Banks Are Already Trying To Buy The 2012 Election" http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/the-big-wall-street-banks-are-already-trying-to-buy-the-2012-election)

Wall Street has already bought the 2012 US Presidential election and the world is going to pay for it.

Whatever your political bent, set your target sites on Congress.

Where do most of the presidential candidates come from?

Congress.

Who can impeach a sitting US President?

Congress.

Who approves the appointment of Supreme Court Judges and can impeach those same judges? (Wikipedia - "Supreme Court of the United States" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States)

Congress (the Senate approves the judges).

Who authorizes national spending?

Congress.

Who writes the tax code, trade policies, and business laws that either benefit, regulate or abolish banking and corporate practices?

Congress.

Who is the Congress directly responsible too?

Us, the American voters.

It is through Congress that we can force the much needed changes and enforce existing laws against the unrepentant, criminal banksters that have destroyed this country and other nations around the world.

Unfortunately it's too late to stop the economic, financial, political and social devastation that is coming.

In the very near future we will have to make decisions that will result in very difficult consequences for generations to come. The damage is already done. There is no quick, easy or painless way to fix things.

The more we know, the better we understand, of what has happened, what is happening and what will happen, the better our decisions will be when the time comes.

I've laid out, in a very general scope, just some of the major problems we face. Some of you may already heard these problems repeatedly from your own news sources, family or friends. Many people are starting to talk about out the problems but few have any workable solutions.

I don't have any concrete solutions either but I do know how to start working on them and above I've laid that process out for you. Learn. Educate others by talking to them about what you have learned. Work the politicians, leveraging them from the local level, through the state level and on up to the federal level.

The global economy is crashing, the global financial system is imploding, due in large part by the insane and reckless machinations of big banks across the globe.

This is going to be one for the history books folks.

Stop believing that we have to drop our pants and bend over because there is nothing we can do about it.

There is a lot that we can do about it... and keep our pants up.

No, I don't care if letting you underwear show is the style, pull your pants up!



Comments
Please, keep your comments clean, civil and relevant. Cussing with foul language just for the sake of using foul language only proves the person to be an obnoxious, dull-witted fool.

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Eliminating Redundant Regulations and Job Growth

The Obama administration wants to eliminate redundant regulations to improve job creation.

Seems to be a bit of a long-shot to me.

Eliminating redundant regulations to spur job growth is sort of like the picking out a few grains of sand will turn the Sahara Desert into fertile farm land.

Eliminating redundant regulations is a good start in any bureaucracy but don't be so naive to think by eliminating some redundant regulations job growth will be greatly improved. The structural problems this country has are just too messed up.

Don't be fooled into believing the only reason businesses aren't hiring is because of too many regulations. Businesses may complain about regulations but the bottom line is that they just don't have enough customers. Whatever regulatory concerns businesses may have would be overcome if businesses were more worried about keeping up with customer demand and the resulting increased positive cash-flow.

(Below is a comment I posted on a related, Marketplace.org news article with a few, afterthought revisions)

Equating the elimination of redundant regulations to an increase in job creation is a stretch. Just like giving multinational corporations tax breaks for bringing their foreign profits back to the US was supposed to spur job growth. The corporations claimed they would use the repatriated money to create more jobs but instead they funneled most of the money back into their own company stock.

Setting that aside, eliminating redundant regulations to reduce paperwork and confusion is a good thing so long as it doesn't weaken the protections and safe guards those redundant regulations provide.

Redundant regulations were built into our property rights laws as fail-safe measures to ensure the protection of our property rights. The banks by-passed some of those redundant regulations resulting bank perpetrated foreclosure fraud and perjury, bank perpetrated mortgage fraud and perjury, and bank robo-signer scams (more bank perpetrated fraud and perjury).

Banks aren't the only guilty parties but they are among the biggest of the crooks.

Other redundant regulations that are involved with safety measures are also a good idea. Eliminating some redundant regulations may actually increase hazards and safety concerns.

Yes, common sense would prevent a lot of accidents but humans have proven too many times not to have common sense. As a former employer told me once, "You gotta make it idiot proof."

Eliminating the redundant regulations that require gas vapor valves on fuel pumps may work with modern cars but not everyone is driving a car made within the last five years, let alone the last fifty years. (Four-on-the-floor, suicide-doors, classic, hot-rod, muscle-cars come to mind.)

I originally come from fly-over country. There, twenty and thirty year old vehicles are not uncommon. (My dad just recently upgraded from a beat-up, 1984, straight-6, 4x4, F-150 with 2-50 air-conditioning - 2 windows rolled down while going 50mph - to a 1992, F350 diesel, 4x4, dually, flat-bed with real air-conditioning.)

Not all farm equipment is diesel powered; cars and trucks are not the only vehicles used. (Tricked-out, rider-lawn-mower races and dear ol' Dad frequents the local eateries by pulling into the parking lots on his gas powered, 1940's Farmall B tractor. They're a different breed out there in fly-over country.)

Not all fuel pumps are at convenience stores (500gal fuel tanks are not uncommon on farms) and not all things filled with gas have any equipment more sophisticated than a tank and a cap - and even a cap may be optional.

Here's a little secret. A lot of equipment "modifications" are made by the people who own or operate the equipment.

That vehicle, at one time, may have had a feature required by redundant regulations but that particular feature has long since been by-passed, cut out, torched off, smashed in, rerouted or re-purposed. Never underestimate the ingenuity of people with tools.

So even as redundant as it may seem to have a gas vapor valve on fuel pumps, those fuel pump valves are a safety precaution against un-safe (and all too frequent) "custom modifications". Sometimes redundant regulations are put in place to protect ourselves from ourselves. ("You gotta make it idiot proof.")

The Obama administration should eliminate regulation redundancies where it won't open up loop holes to be exploited and where no safety measures will be compromised. But don't be fooled into believing the BS that eliminating these redundant regulations will increase job growth by any significant amount. The structural problems of this country are too great and too unstable to create any real job growth anytime soon.



Comments
Please, keep your comments clean, civil and relevant. Cussing with foul language just for the sake of using foul language only proves the person to be an obnoxious, dull-witted fool.



Related Links:

Marketplace.org: White House says removing redundant regulations will grow jobs

http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2011/08/23/am-white-house-says-removing-redundant-regulations-will-grow-jobs/

TractorData.com - Farmall B

http://www.tractordata.com/farm-tractors/000/2/8/286-farmall-b.html

Friday, August 19, 2011

Fact-Checking Links Conundrum

I'm trying to figure out what would be the best way to include fact-checking links in posts.

One thought is to use the relevant words in the posts as the thing to click on to go to where ever I found the information I'm referring to. But I've noticed a lot of websites use this for ads instead of fact-checking.

(You know - you move your mouse pointer over the different colored words in the paragraph you are reading and up pops an ad for something that may or may not even be relevant. Those ads annoy me so I avoid them. Unless I'm fact-checking, then I'll hover over the link to see what happens.)

There are a couple web sites that I frequent that actually use the linked words for fact-checking or as links to other related posts on their web site. Because I frequent those web sites so often I know what to expect.

On the other hand, someone new to the web site (or blog in this case) may have the same aversion I have to the ad word links. They might not click on the link words to continue learning by reading the linked-to related posts, news articles or documents (pdf files, images, charts, graphs, etc).

Another thought is to just dump all the fact-checking links at the bottom of the page and have a number assigned to them that matches the numbers scattered throughout the blog post. Kind of like footnotes in a reference book.

I hate footnotes. I'm constantly going back and forth between what I was reading and the footnotes clear at the bottom of the page (or worse, at the back of the book). But then, other folks may prefer this.

Before I click on a link I check out it's URL to see where it comes from. If the URL has "wsj", or "reuters" in the beginning I know it comes from a big-name news source. If the URL begins with a web site or blog I frequent I'm even more likely to click-through (actually, open in another web browser tab for later).

Not everyone who uses the Internet may be savvy enough to know how to check the URL without actually clicking through. Having fact-checking and/or topic related links listed at the bottom, in full-length, may prove useful, maybe even desirable, to some because then they can see where that link may take them before clicking on it.

So a link dump at the bottom of the page could be useful to some.

Hmm...

Maybe... some combination of both ideas?

I could put a short message near the end of each post saying something like, "The colored words in the above post are links to related news articles, posts or documents. They are not ads.".

That would let new or infrequent visitors know, in general, what those colored words are linked to.

Instead of just dumping a bunch of links at the bottom I could put a meaningful description next to each one.

That might help folks determine if the link is interesting enough to investigate further or not.

Hmm...




Comments
Please, keep your comments clean, civil and relevant. Cussing with foul language just for the sake of using foul language only proves the person to be an obnoxious, dull-witted fool.

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

The Fiscal Folly of Fools

A cartoon of a clown-face.
Our future is not in good hands.
"A fool and his money are soon parted." This happens even faster and greater when the fool owns the money printing press.

The US debt ceiling deal was done and the shortly there after debunked as nothing but an utter joke by the Congressional Budget Office. The CBO came up with pretty much the same conclusion when Congress was farting around with the federal budget and risked a federal government shutdown earlier this spring.

Well, in a few short weeks the whole charade will begin again. September 30, 2011, is when the federal budget for 2012 is due and Congress hasn't even started on it yet. Like last year they will most likely pass a series of temporary resolutions instead of a real budget. The strategy will be to push the debate as close to next year's presidential election as possible; then make a big stink of it.

The way the US government is burning through money there is a good chance that the debt ceiling could be breached, again, sometime near the 2012 presidential election. Given the politicians' childish behavior so far, it is almost certain that the Republicans will do what ever they can to make sure the debt ceiling is breached during the next campaign cycle for their own petty, political gains - what's best for the country be damned.

S&P downgraded the US's credit rating to AA+ (with a negative outlook) less because of the fiscal policy and more because of the ludicrous behavior of the policy makers! The politicians' shenanigans got so bad that not only did the international community get fed up with the damn fools but so did Joe and Jane Sixpack-American. Losing international confidence is one thing; losing it at home is even worse.

In the last election cycle the voters were voicing a growing disdain for all incumbents. This next election cycle may see that anger come to fruition.

Last week the markets went through violent convulsions unlike any time before. Down 500 points one day, up 400 points the next, then down 600 points another day followed by another several-hundred point upswing. These were not flash-crashes.

Flash crashes have been occurring more frequently. In March of last year the markets crashed by 1,000 points instantly and then just as fast, instantly recovered. Flash crashes are caused by the computers that are running thousands of trades per second. "SkyNet", "H.A.L." and even "Johnny-5" are running the stock market now. But once in a while the humans reclaim control and override the computers.

That's what happened last week; the humans took control and proceeded to panic. The crashes and recoveries each took an entire day, from start to close of the markets, instead of the mere milliseconds that it would take for a computer algorithm to process.

What is curious is that the recoveries were greater than the typical market "dead-cat-bounce". There is speculation that the government stepped in and covertly manipulated the markets into a false recovery. The government openly manipulates markets every day through regulations, tariffs, and other, known regulatory policies but something about the rebounds of last week smells fishy.

Gold shot up more than $200 in two week's time to over $1,800 per ounce. Only a few years ago gold was priced around $500 per ounce. That was when the US economy and the dollar were strong and stable. The price movements of gold have long been an indicator of bigger things going on. Margin hikes have put a damper on the price of gold for the moment but the reasons for it's rapid price ascent are still very much present. Big moves in gold mean big problems - those, the world economies have in spades.

The Eurozone looks like it is on the verge of it's own "Lehman Brother's" moment. It's not the governments that are (directly) in trouble, it's the banks that are sinking; particularly German and French banks. All the big banks are interconnected through deals and credit default swaps. When the big banks go down they take everyone with them. The big banks are all interconnected - even the big American banks are tied to the European banks.

When Lehman Brother's went under in 2008 it was the main economic trigger for the cascading financial implosion that occurred across the globe (all big banks are interconnected). Since Lehman Brothers was an American-based bank, the US was at the epicenter of the 2008 collapse. Now it is big European banks that are putting the Eurozone at the epicenter of the next global banking crisis.

Or not...

Over on this side of the pond, one of the six, American mega-banks that could take down the entire country (and the rest of the global economy with it - things are that precarious around the globe), Bank of America might turnout to be the next Lehman Brothers.

Already $118 billion of Bank of America's toxic assets have been guaranteed by the US Government (read: bought by the US taxpayer) and now it looks like another $73 billion of Bank of America's toxic assets will be dumped into Fannie Mae (read again: bought and paid-for by the US taxpayer). If that doesn't work maybe JP Morgan-Chase will take over Bank of America. JP Morgan-Chase can afford to do this (even though they had to be bailed out too) because JP Morgan-Chase sits on the board of directors of the Federal Reserve. This grants JP Morgan-Chase direct access to the money-printing presses (read yet again: bought, paid-for and bailed-out by the US taxpayer).

It's a race to the bottom. Which to-big-to-fail bank will scuttle the global economy next?

Oh, and the $800 billion dollar TARP, bank bailout of 2008... seems not all of the money has been paid back... and during the same time period the Federal Reserve was quietly shoveling out trillions of US taxpayer dollars to foreign banks and foreign corporations.

Look at page 205 (page 218 in Adobe Reader page search) of the GAO (US Government Accountability Office) Fed Investigation Report. See that $10,057 total at the bottom of the table 24 and the upper left corner of the table state that the figures are "Dollars in billions"? That means the $10,057 isn't ten thousand, fifty-seven dollars... it means the amount is ten trillion, fifty-seven billion dollars! ($10,057 x 1 billion)

$10,057 dollars in billions?

No wonder the government can't figure out a budget! It sees $10,057 when the figure is really $10,057,000,000,000!

How many American taxpayers would think it's OK to bail out foreign banks with $10 trillion US taxpayer dollars while millions American taxpayers have lost their jobs and lost their homes? (Oh, and don't forget that America is in an additional $15 trillion dollars of debt.)

How many American taxpayers, jobless, homeless, or otherwise, would think it's OK to bail out the Central Bank of Libya with US taxpayer dollars? (Which the Federal Reserve did.)

A misallocation of US capital?

A misrepresentation of the American people's will?

A big mistake?

Oh, yeah. Definitely.



Comments
Please, keep your comments clean, civil and relevant. Cussing with foul language just for the sake of using foul language only proves the person to be an obnoxious, dull-witted fool.



Related Links:
Zero Hedge - Bank Of America Continues Firesales To Shore Up Liquidity, Sells Canadian Credit Card Business To TD Group

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/bank-america-continues-firesales-shore-liquidity-sells-canadian-credit-card-business-td-group

The Stock Market Watch - Bank of America is the 2011 Lehman Brothers (Debt Man Walking)

http://thestockmarketwatch.com/newsletters/2011/08/10/bank-of-america-is-the-2011-lehman-brothers-debt-man-walking/

Wikipedia - Troubled Asset Relief Program (T.A.R.P.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troubled_Asset_Relief_Program

Bernie Sanders, US Senator for Vermont (I) - The Fed Audit

http://sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=9e2a4ea8-6e73-4be2-a753-62060dcbb3c3

Wikipedia - Government Accountability Office (GAO)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Accountability_Office

Bernie Sanders, US Senator for Vermont (I) - (pdf file of Fed Investigation) GAO Report to Congressional Addressees, FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, Opportunities Exist to Strengthen Policies and Processes for Managing Emergency Assistance

http://sanders.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/GAO%20Fed%20Investigation.pdf

Bernie Sanders, US Senator for Vermont (I) - Release: Why Did the Fed Bail Out the Bank of Libya?

http://sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=ece720e4-d5d6-4eff-937c-dcada784c3f9